Exposure to pesticides is one key
reason why children today are more likely to have a wide range of such diseases
and disorders as cancer, autism, birth defects and asthma than children of a
generation ago, according a study released yesterday.
‘We have waited much, much too
long to make the health of our children our national priority,” lamented
Kristin Schafer, a mother of two, and lead author of the report, "A Generation in Jeopardy," by the Pesticide Action Network of North America (PANNA).
Schafer, PANNA’s senior policy
strategist and a veteran policy research analyst, pointed out that a raft of
studies has shown that between 400,000 to 600,000 of the 4 million children
born each year in the United States, are affected by a developmental disorder.
Scientists, she said, are calling it “a silent pandemic.”
Schafer and her team of
researchers studied the link between pesticide exposure and developmental
disorders in children for more than 10 months, reviewing more than 200
scientific studies and government data that tracked them.
What they learned was “quite
startling,” she said citing figures that show that more than 10,000 kids are
diagnosed with cancer each year and more than 7 million kids have asthma.
There’s been a spike in the incidence of leukemia and brain cancer, she said.
“This generation is less likely
to reach its full potential” Schafer said, but quickly pointed out that
pesticides are not the only drivers of an increase in developmental disorders,
and that genetic and environmental factors can also play a role.
The report highlights the
innovative policies communities across the country have adopted to protect
children from pesticides where they live, learn and play. In California, for
instance, the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) has replaced the
use of harmful pesticides in its schools with so-called integrated pest
management practices.
Willie Green, SFUSD’s director
for custodial services, said its schools use the least amount of toxic
chemicals or none at all to address their pest problems, thanks to the city’s
1996 integrated pest management ordinance.
SFUSD contracts with a pest
control agency to make sure that any pest problems its schools face are
addressed with the least use of harmful chemicals. For instance, better door
sweeps have prevented rodents from entering buildings.
“If a problem can be addressed
without using pesticides, that’s the way we go,” Green asserted.
Schafer pointed out that some
schools in the Central Valley, which has a strong agricultural base, have
protective buffer zones for schools and neighborhoods to keep children out of
harm’s way. Pesticide-free schools exists in such states as Connecticut, as
well, she said.
Tracey Woodruff, a professor at
UCSF’s School of Medicine, pointed out why children are especially vulnerable
to the harms of pesticide exposure. She said they have “quickly growing” bodies
that take in more of everything.
“They eat and drink more, pound
for pound, than adults,” Woodruff said, noting that children’s “physiological
systems undergo rapid changes from the womb through adolescence.
“Anything that interrupts the
processes, like pesticides and industrial chemicals even at very low levels,
can lead to significant health harms,” she said.
San Francisco’s bold Integrated
Pest Management (IPM) program should be emulated by other cities to protect the
health of its citizenry, said Chris Geiger, manager of the IPM program at the
San Francisco Department of the Environment.
Geiger acknowledged that while
the city ordinance was only a small step because it applied only to city
property, it was an important step nevertheless. Local communities should not
depend on federal regulations because enforcing them fully takes a long time.
The report points to the need for
such reforms to reduce pesticide use as:
• Introduction of policies that
allow enforcement agencies to act quickly to pull pesticides off the market,
when independent studies indicate they are harmful.
• Support innovative farmers as
they transition away from pesticide use.
• Track national pesticide use
reduction goals, with a focus on those pesticides that studies indicate are
harmful to children.
• Withdraw harmful pesticide
products from use in homes, daycare centers and schools.
• Establish pesticide-free zones
around schools, daycare centers and neighborhoods in agricultural areas to
protect children from harmful exposures, especially pesticide drifts.
The report was released in 10
cities nationwide yesterday. Here, in the city, it was released at the Sunset
Elementary School where teaching time is set aside to show children how to
maintain an organic vegetable garden.
New American Media
Please share
No comments:
Post a Comment