Chinese food including, fried chicken wings, fried wonton, fried rice, fried egg roll and fried dumplings sit on a table. (Joe Raedle, Getty Images)
In study findings that may not surprise many people, kids and teens ate
more calories - including more fat and more sugar - on days when they had a
meal from a fast-food or sit-down restaurant. "Parents (should) realize
that restaurant consumption is not a straight-off substitute for eating at
home. Restaurant consumption and fast-food consumption should not be the
norm," said lead researcher Lisa Powell from the University of Illinois at
Chicago. "The additional calories and the additional sugar and saturated
fat and sodium that are taken in and then consistently taken in will have some
longer-term consequences," she told Reuters Health - such as an increased
risk of obesity and diabetes.
For their new study, Powell and her co-author Binh Nguyen used data from
nationally-representative health surveys conducted in the United States between
2003 and 2008. On two different occasions, more than 9,000 teens were asked to
recall everything they'd had to eat or drink in the past 24 hours. Parents were
asked the same question for their younger children. Between 24 and 42 percent
of kids and teens had gotten take-out or eaten at a fast-food restaurant during
each day they were questioned, and seven to 18 percent had eaten at a
full-service restaurant.
Based on the researchers' calculations, adolescents ate and drank an
extra 310 calories on days they had fast food and an extra 267 on days they ate
at a full-service restaurant. Younger kids age two to 11 had an extra 126 and
160 calories on those days, on average. Kids from poorer families got the most
extra calories on days when they went to a fast-food or sit-down restaurant. "This
is something that we really should be worried about, because this is going to
increase health disparities among different socioeconomic groups," Powell
said.
Eating at either type of restaurant was also tied to a drop in the
amount of milk kids drank during the day, the researchers reported Monday in
the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. Their study was funded by
the National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
ARE OTHER
RESTAURANTS HEALTHIER?
Dr. Jason Block, an obesity and nutrition researcher from Harvard
Medical School, said that although fast-food chains may be especially
concerning because they advertise to kids, sit-down restaurants aren't
necessarily healthier places to eat. "There's been an assumption that
fast-food meals are bad where full-service restaurants tend to get a
pass," Block, who wasn't involved in the new research, told Reuters
Health. "Full-service restaurant meals are high-calorie, high-fat,
high-sodium as well, and that should be a focus of people's interest, not just
fast food."
"The restaurant industry is employing a wide range of strategies to
play a positive role in food and healthy living issues, including advocating
for a national nutrition information standard and adding more healthful items
to menus," Joan Rector McGlockton, vice president of industry affairs and
food policy at the National Restaurant Association, told Reuters Health in an
email. "In fact, more than 110 restaurant brands representing 30,000
locations have committed to the National Restaurant Association's Kids LiveWell
program, offering menu options that meet the 2010 USDA Dietary
Guidelines."
Block said parents should be aware that when their family is eating out,
they're probably going to eat more, and worse, than they would at another meal.
"If you're going to eat a fast-food or full-service meal, there needs to
be a conscious effort to compensate throughout the day," he said.
SOURCE: Archives of Pediatrics and Chicago Tribune
No comments:
Post a Comment